
I've had this discussion with several people in the last few weeks. And the answer, I think, is yes – for these reasons.
1) Peyton Manning is not Barry Bonds.
For the last five years, Manning and Bonds have both been the best players in their respective sports. And we don't love either of them the way we love other superstars. But that's where the similarities end.
Bonds is a jerk and a cheater; Manning is unlikable for entirely different reasons. They're the same reasons people don't like Duke basketball or Alex Rodriguez. Keith Olbermann's recent description of Rodriguez applies: "I think he thinks his success is predicated on self-control, on physical self-control. But it means he acts - in what he says, in the gestures he makes when he hits a home run or a double, like a ballet dancer trying to memorize his steps. He aims to please. He never just lets it wail."
We don't like Bonds because he's indifferent. We don't like Manning because he cares too much.
2) The Indianapolis Colts are not the New York Yankees.
They are probably the closest thing the Patriots have to a rival, but they are not bad, so to speak. They do not outspend their nearest competitors by 65% by exploiting a communist statute that prevents other teams from moving into their oversized media market. They are not owned by a convicted felon who broke the law to help reelect the most corrupt president of the 20th century. They aren't perennially overrated, leading naïve nine-year-olds to waste their allowances the rookie cards of overhyped Yankee prospects. They're not smug. They're not the subject of weird media fetishes. And their fans didn't all root for the Mets in the '80s.
3) Fantasy football isn't real football.
Having Peyton Manning on your fantasy team is like having an opposite-sex friendship. It's potentially complicated, but something everyone above the age of twelve should be able to do.